
C. Jared Clark, Esq.
Las Vegas personal injury attorney
Las Vegas slip and fall lawyer at Clark Law Group. Premises liability, notice evidence, casino and store falls. Free consultation. Call (702) 330-3272.
Free consultation · No fee if no recovery · Mon-Fri 8:30 AM-5 PM
No fee if no recovery · Mon-Fri 8:30 AM-5 PM · Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Attorney advertising. This information is not legal advice. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
In short: A fall claim in Nevada is not won by showing that you fell. It is won by showing what the dangerous condition was, that the business created it or should have known about it, and that it did nothing reasonable about it. Clark Law Group, PLLC in Las Vegas can review the incident, request that video and inspection records be preserved, and explain what the claim actually requires. Consultations are free. On personal-injury matters, you do not pay an attorney fee if there is no recovery. Call 702-330-3272 Monday through Friday, 8:30 AM to 5 PM, or contact the office. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nevada law starts from a limit, not from a promise. The owner or occupant of property is not an insurer of the safety of people on the premises, and an accident occurring on the premises does not by itself establish negligence. At the same time, a business owes its patrons a duty to keep the premises in a reasonably safe condition for use. The Nevada Supreme Court set out both halves of that rule in Sprague v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 109 Nev. 247 (1993).
The case then divides on one question: who put the hazard there.
That second branch is where many Las Vegas fall claims are contested. Constructive notice is about what a reasonable inspection should have found. It can be built from how long the hazard sat there, from the store's own sweep or inspection schedule, or from a pattern. In Sprague itself, the court allowed a theory that a continual buildup of debris in a produce department could put the store on constructive notice that a hazard could exist at any time, and that failing to use a countermeasure such as skid mats could be unreasonable.
For decades, an obvious hazard was treated as a complete answer for the property owner. Nevada changed that. In Foster v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 128 Nev. 773 (2012), the Nevada Supreme Court adopted section 51 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts and held that a landowner owes a duty of reasonable care to entrants for risks that exist on the property, and that the open and obvious nature of a dangerous condition does not automatically relieve a landowner from that general duty.
Obviousness still matters. It goes to whether the owner acted reasonably, and it goes to comparative fault under NRS 41.141. It is an argument, not an automatic loss.
Clark Law Group reviews fall claims from the kinds of properties this valley actually has:
Naming a property type does not decide a claim. Each one just changes which records exist and who holds them.
Surveillance video can turn a description into proof. Retention varies widely between businesses and systems, and some footage is overwritten well before a claim is presented, so a written preservation request early and in specific terms is worth making. A request is not the only thing that can create a duty to preserve, and it does not by itself guarantee that footage is kept. Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e) addresses electronically stored information that should have been preserved in the anticipation or conduct of litigation and is lost because a party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve it; a court may order measures to cure the resulting prejudice, and, only on finding an intent to deprive another party of the information's use, may go further. See NRCP 37(e).
What is normally worth requesting:
What is worth keeping yourself: the shoes and clothing you were wearing, unwashed and unworn; your own photographs; and a written timeline made while the details are fresh.
A fall in a public building or on government-maintained ground can raise a different set of questions. Start by identifying who actually owns, occupies, or maintains the place. A public-looking location is not automatically a public defendant: a transit stop, a parking structure, or a plaza can be owned, leased, or maintained by a private company, and a private contractor doing work for a public body is a different defendant again. That question comes first, because the rules below only matter if a Nevada governmental entity is in fact a defendant.
If one is, two provisions are worth knowing about, and both come with limits:
| Issue | What Nevada law provides | | --- | --- | | Injury filing deadline | Generally 2 years from the date of injury (NRS 11.190) | | Duty of the property owner | Reasonable care to entrants for risks on the property (Foster v. Costco, 128 Nev. 773 (2012)) | | Hazard created by a third party | Actual or constructive notice plus failure to remedy (Sprague v. Lucky Stores, 109 Nev. 247 (1993)) | | Open and obvious hazard | Does not automatically end the duty; bears on reasonableness and comparative fault | | Fault rule | Modified comparative negligence, 51% bar (NRS 41.141) | | Covered claims against a Nevada public entity | Administrative claim filed within 2 years, which NRS 41.036(3) states is not a condition precedent to suit; $200,000 limit and no punitive damages on the tort claims NRS 41.035 covers. Whether a defendant is a public entity at all is a fact question | | Attorney fee on injury matters | No attorney fee if there is no recovery |
This table is general information, not legal advice.
If someone asks you for a recorded statement, the answer depends on who is asking. A property's insurer or a third-party claims administrator is generally a party you have no contractual obligation to, and many people decline until they have advice. Your own insurer is different, because policies normally contain a cooperation clause and an outright refusal can create a coverage problem. A subpoena or other legal process is different again and cannot be ignored. Find out who is asking and why, check what your own policy requires, and get advice before you answer.
C. Jared Clark, Esq. is the designated responsible attorney for Clark Law Group. He earned a Bachelor of Science from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, and a Juris Doctor, cum laude, from Thomas Jefferson School of Law. He interned for the Honorable John A. Houston, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of California, and for the San Diego Public Defender's office. He has lived in Nevada since 1988 and is a member of the State Bar of Nevada, the American Bar Association, and the Nevada Justice Association. Read more about the attorneys.
The office is at 2320 Potosi St, Las Vegas, NV 89146, and hours are Monday through Friday, 8:30 AM to 5 PM. A fall is one kind of personal injury claim; if a vehicle was involved instead, start with the car accident page.
This page is attorney advertising and general information, not legal advice. Statutes, rules and case law change, and how any of them apply depends on the facts. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee future outcomes.
The four amounts below are reproduced from the Clark Law Group legacy homepage. Past results do not guarantee, predict, or warrant a similar outcome.
Free Consultation →Missed work, medical bills, your family. We carry the legal weight so you can focus on recovering.

Las Vegas personal injury attorney

Call (702) 330-3272 during business hours or send a message on the contact page. Consultations are free.

Counsel looks at medical records, witness statements, and police reports and can deal with insurers on your behalf.

You get a plain-language view of options. On injury matters, the firm states you do not pay an attorney fee if there is no recovery.
No. Nevada law is clear that an owner is not an insurer of everyone on the property, and that an accident on the premises does not by itself establish negligence (Sprague v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 109 Nev. 247 (1993)). A claim has to show a dangerous condition, that the business either created it or knew or should have known about it, and that it failed to fix or warn.
If a business or its employee put the substance on the floor, that fact alone can support liability. If someone else caused it, liability lies only if the business had actual or constructive notice of the condition and failed to remedy it (Sprague v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 109 Nev. 247 (1993)). Constructive notice can come from how long the hazard was there or from a recurring condition the business already knew about.
Not automatically. In Foster v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 128 Nev. 773 (2012), the Nevada Supreme Court held that the open and obvious nature of a dangerous condition does not automatically relieve a landowner from the general duty of reasonable care. Obviousness instead bears on whether the owner acted reasonably and on comparative fault under NRS 41.141.
Many Nevada injury lawsuits must be filed within two years of the injury under NRS 11.190, and some matters follow different rules. If a Nevada governmental entity turns out to be a defendant, NRS 41.036 provides for an administrative claim filed with the Attorney General or the political subdivision's governing body within two years of accrual, and subsection 3 states that this filing is not a condition precedent to bringing an action. A separate provision, NRS 41.035, limits the award on the tort claims it covers to $200,000 and excludes punitive damages. Whether any of that applies starts with who actually owns, occupies, or maintains the property, which is often not obvious. Call (702) 330-3272 if a public location may be involved.
Surveillance video, the incident report the business wrote, the identity of the employee who responded, inspection or sweep logs, photographs of the exact condition and your footwear, the clothing you were wearing, and witness names. Retention practices for video vary widely, and some systems overwrite well before a claim is presented, so an early written preservation request is worth making. Separately, preservation duties can arise once litigation is anticipated; NRCP 37(e) addresses lost electronically stored information.
Nevada uses modified comparative negligence with a 51% bar (NRS 41.141). You can still recover if you were 50% or less at fault, and the award is reduced by your share. If you are found more than 50% responsible, recovery can be barred. A property owner's insurer may raise what you were looking at, what you were carrying, or what you were wearing, which is why photographs and a written timeline are useful.
On personal-injury matters, Clark Law Group states that consultations are free and you do not pay an attorney fee if there is no recovery. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Call (702) 330-3272 — no pressure for the first 10 minutes.

Free consultation. Mon-Fri 8:30 AM-5 PM. On injury matters, no attorney fee if there is no recovery.
Personal injury help in Las Vegas and across Nevada.