
C. Jared Clark, Esq.
Las Vegas personal injury attorney
Las Vegas dog bite lawyer at Clark Law Group. How Nevada handles dog-attack injury claims, local leash rules, and deadlines. Free consultation. (702) 330-3272.
Free consultation · No fee if no recovery · Open 24/7
No fee if no recovery · Open 24/7 · Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Attorney advertising. This information is not legal advice. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
In short: Nevada has no statute that makes a dog's owner automatically liable for a bite. Dog-attack claims here are usually built on ordinary negligence: how the owner controlled the dog, whether local leash and restraint rules were followed, and what the owner knew about the dog's behavior. Clark Law Group, PLLC in Las Vegas can review what happened, identify the owner and any insurance, and explain how Nevada law applies to your facts. Consultations are free. On personal-injury matters, you do not pay an attorney fee if there is no recovery. Call 702-330-3272 any time, 24/7, or contact the office. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.
No. Many states have a statute making an owner liable for any bite regardless of fault. Nevada's general civil liability chapter, NRS Chapter 41, has no such provision. A Nevada dog bite claim is usually a negligence claim built from the owner's conduct, local restraint rules, and what the owner knew about the dog.
That conclusion comes from reading NRS Chapter 41 and NRS 202.500 and finding no civil strict-liability provision for dog bites. It is a reasoned reading of those chapters, and a lawyer should confirm the position for the specific facts rather than relying on a general statement.
The Nevada Supreme Court has analyzed these claims under general tort principles. In Wright v. Schum, 105 Nev. 611, 781 P.2d 1142 (1989), an eleven-year-old boy was badly hurt by a tenant's dog that escaped from a rented property. The court held that the property owner could not be held liable simply because he was the landlord. It analyzed his liability instead under the ordinary rule for someone who undertakes to perform a duty of care owed by another and performs it negligently. In other words, the question was what he actually did, not what he owned.
NRS 202.500 is a criminal statute. It defines "dangerous" and "vicious" dogs and makes certain owner conduct a crime, including a felony when a dog known to be vicious causes substantial bodily harm. It is not a compensation statute, but a prior designation can be strong evidence of what an owner knew.
Under the statute, a dog can be declared "dangerous" by a law enforcement agency after it behaves menacingly without provocation on two separate occasions within 18 months while off its owner's property or unconfined. A dog is "vicious" if, without provocation, it kills or causes substantial bodily harm to a person, or keeps behaving dangerously after the owner has been notified. The statute also sets limits that come up in civil claims:
Local animal ordinances often supply the clearest duty in a dog bite claim. Clark County, the City of Las Vegas, Henderson, and North Las Vegas each have their own animal codes, so the rule that applies depends on exactly where the attack happened. Henderson and North Las Vegas both require dogs to be leashed or confined.
A violation of a leash or at-large rule does not decide a civil case by itself, but it is often central evidence that the owner failed to use reasonable care. Animal-control reports, prior citations, and neighbor accounts are how that evidence is usually gathered.
| Where the attack happened | Agency | Phone |
|---|---|---|
| Henderson | Henderson Animal Protection Services | 702-267-4980 |
| North Las Vegas | North Las Vegas Animal Protection Services | 702-633-1750 |
| City of Las Vegas | City of Las Vegas Animal Protection Services | 702-229-6444, option 2 |
| Unincorporated Clark County | Clark County Animal Protection Services | 702-455-7710 |
Clark County's animal protection agency says a confirmed bite leads to a 10-day rabies quarantine for the animal. The report also becomes part of the dog's history, which matters if the dog attacks again. Call 911 first if anyone is seriously hurt or the dog is still a danger.
A strong dog bite claim usually rests on five things: who owned or controlled the dog, how it was restrained, what the owner knew about its past behavior, where the attack happened and why you were there, and a complete medical record of the injury and its treatment.
Dog attacks also cause injuries without a bite: a cyclist knocked down by a loose dog, a runner who falls while fleeing, or a delivery worker hurt on a porch. The same negligence analysis applies.
Payment often comes from a homeowner's or renter's liability policy rather than from the owner personally. Those policies have limits and exclusions, and some exclude specific animals or dogs with a prior bite history, so the actual policy language matters. A landlord, business, or dog-care company can sometimes share responsibility.
The first practical step is identifying the owner's address so the right policy can be found. Where the attack happened at a rental property, a dog daycare, a groomer, or a business, there may be more than one party and more than one policy. Whether anyone other than the owner is responsible depends on what that party actually did or agreed to do, as Wright v. Schum illustrates.
Many Nevada injury lawsuits must be filed within two years of the injury under NRS 11.190, and time while a child is under 18 is not counted (NRS 11.250). Nevada's comparative-fault rule also applies: if your share of fault is not greater than the owner's, recovery is reduced by your percentage, not barred (NRS 41.141).
| Issue | What Nevada law provides |
|---|---|
| Filing deadline | Many injury lawsuits must be filed within 2 years (NRS 11.190(4)(e)) |
| Injured child | Time while the injured person is under 18 is not counted (NRS 11.250) |
| Fault rule | Modified comparative negligence; recovery barred if your fault is greater than the defendant's (NRS 41.141) |
| Dangerous or vicious dog | Criminal statute; no designation based solely on breed (NRS 202.500) |
| Strict liability | No civil strict-liability dog bite statute found in NRS Chapter 41 |
| Attorney fee on personal-injury matters | No attorney fee if there is no recovery |
Arguments about provocation, about reaching over a fence, or about approaching a restrained dog are usually arguments about that percentage. Photos of the location, the fence or gate, and the leash, taken soon after the attack, help answer them.
It depends on who is asking. You generally have no contractual obligation to the dog owner's homeowner's or renter's carrier, and many people decline until they have advice. Your own insurer, if one is involved, is different, because policies normally contain a cooperation clause. A subpoena or other legal process cannot be ignored.
An adjuster may ask whether you reached toward the dog, whether you knew it, or whether you were on the property with permission. Those answers go to fault. Find out exactly who is calling, check what your own policy requires, and get advice before you answer.
The personal injury page explains how a Nevada negligence claim usually moves from medical care to settlement or suit.
C. Jared Clark, Esq. is the designated responsible attorney for Clark Law Group. He earned a Bachelor of Science from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, and a Juris Doctor, cum laude, from Thomas Jefferson School of Law. During law school he interned for the Honorable John A. Houston, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of California, and for the San Diego Public Defender's office. He has lived in Nevada since 1988 and is a member of the State Bar of Nevada, the American Bar Association, and the Nevada Justice Association. Read more about Jared Clark.
The office is at 2320 Potosi St, Las Vegas, NV 89146. The firm is open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Last updated October 20, 2026.
This page is attorney advertising and general information, not legal advice. Statutes, ordinances, and case law change, and how any of them apply depends on the facts. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Published Clark Law Group recoveries. Past results do not guarantee, predict, or warrant a similar outcome.
Free Consultation →Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is different.
Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is different.
Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is different.
Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is different.
Missed work, medical bills, your family. We carry the legal weight so you can focus on recovering.

Las Vegas personal injury attorney

Call (702) 330-3272 during business hours or send a message on the contact page. Consultations are free.

Counsel looks at medical records, witness statements, and police reports and can deal with insurers on your behalf.

You get a plain-language view of options. On injury matters, the firm states you do not pay an attorney fee if there is no recovery.
No Nevada statute makes a dog's owner automatically liable for a bite the way some states do. Nevada's civil liability chapter, NRS Chapter 41, has no such provision. Claims are usually built on ordinary negligence: what the owner did, what the owner knew or should have known, and whether local leash and restraint rules were followed.
Not necessarily. A prior bite or complaint can be strong evidence of what the owner knew, but a claim can also rest on the owner's conduct, such as letting the dog run loose in violation of a Henderson, North Las Vegas, or other local leash rule. This page states no Nevada first-bite rule, because no on-point Nevada holding was verified.
Not as the legal test. NRS 202.500 says a dog may not be found dangerous or vicious based solely on its breed, and it bars local governments from adopting breed-based rules. A dog also may not be declared dangerous or vicious for defending itself against someone who was committing a crime or provoking it.
Sometimes, but not simply for owning the property. In Wright v. Schum (1989), the Nevada Supreme Court held a landlord is not liable merely as a landlord, while recognizing liability can arise if the landlord undertook to protect others and did so carelessly. Whether that fits depends on what the landlord actually did.
It can be. Many Nevada injury lawsuits must be filed within two years under NRS 11.190, but NRS 11.250 says time while the injured person is under 18 is not counted toward that period. That is a reason to ask early, not to assume there is extra time. Evidence about the dog and owner fades fast.
Often a homeowner's or renter's liability policy rather than the owner personally. Those policies have limits and exclusions, and some exclude certain animals or prior-bite dogs, so the actual policy language matters. Where no policy applies, collecting from the owner directly can be harder, which is worth knowing before deciding how to proceed.
On personal-injury matters, including dog bite claims, Clark Law Group states that consultations are free and you do not pay an attorney fee if there is no recovery. Fee terms for a specific matter are explained before you hire counsel. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Call (702) 330-3272 — no pressure for the first 10 minutes.

Free consultation, 24/7. On injury matters, no attorney fee if there is no recovery.
Personal injury help in Las Vegas and across Nevada.